play slot free scr 888:play,slot,free,scr,888,锘,The,M:锘?p> 'The May Fourth No Theory' and 'A Great Mistakes' Disappeared After the Third Plenary Session of the 11th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China in 1978, some people in the academic circles used ideological emancipation and
锘?p> 'The May Fourth No Theory' and 'A Great Mistakes' Disappeared After the Third Plenary Session of the 11th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China in 1978, some people in the academic circles used ideological emancipation and political air. With a little active time, I began to break free from shackles, think independently, and re-examine Chen Duxiu鈥檚 life thoughts and activities with a scientific attitude, and found that the above crimes could not be established.
Besides the crime of 'traitor' is completely framed, some are the products of the 'theoretic interpretation power' of the power masters (that is, 'the king is defeated'); others are the different opinions in the revolutionary camp. The result of demonization.
Therefore, from the standpoint of justice, this case is the biggest false and wrong case in the history of the Communist Party.
This review is briefly described below. [Abstract] 'The biggest false and wrong case in the history of the Communist Party of China' is that Chen Duxiu was detained with 'Ten sins': the second revolutionary theory of opportunism, right opportunism, right-handed capitulationism, and cancellation of Chen. School, anti-Soviet, anti-communist international, anti-Party, counter-revolutionary, traitor, traitor. However, due to the political pressure and traditional ideas, the fact that few people have been studying the original intention of Chen Duxiu's article seriously like Jia Lichen and Mr. Jiang Tian for decades. Until March 1999, at the seminar on the history of the Chinese Communist Party, which was held in the Party History Research Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, the author conveyed Mr. Jiang Tian鈥檚 point of view and raised the question: If Chen Duxiu refers to the bourgeoisie after the victory of the National Revolution The situation of holding the political power refers to the situation after the Russian Revolution in February. The bourgeoisie took power and established the bourgeois government, followed by the October Revolution. From this, can it be said that Lenin is the second revolution of opportunism? s'? Many authoritative scholars present admitted that 'no'! Then, the author points out: Now, when we summarize the historical lessons of the Soviet Union's construction of socialism and the final disintegration and the failure of China's failure to build socialism in the 1950s, we find that even after the democratic revolution, even the so-called proletariat holds In the social economy, the political power must have a long-term development or use of the capitalist economy. Otherwise, it is a populist fantasy.
So, the thought in Chen Duxiu's two articles in 1923 is not right, but 'left'.
Because he believes that after the democratic revolution, the socialist revolution will happen soon, excluding a long period of capitalist development.
However, his point of view is still shaken.
Until 1938, Chen Duxiu really realized that he had published articles such as 'Capitalism in China', 'People Against Capitalism', 'We Don't Be afraid of Capitalism', and must be sufficient for countries as backward as China. The idea of ??developing a capitalist economy to transition to socialism has been comprehensively discussed.
At this time, Chen Duxiu became the so-called 'second revolutionary theorist' in the above-mentioned criticism.
However, this is precisely the theory of Marxism.
Hu Xian, a Chinese Marxist theorist, also clearly pointed out in his later years that the so-called 'second revolutionary theory', 'this is indeed Marxism'; 'Marxism speaks of the theory of constant revolution, which is what it means.'
After the reform and opening up, the planned economy was changed to a market economy. At first, the market economy was surnamed 'social' or surnamed 'capital'. The debate was fierce.
Deng Xiaoping said that instead of arguing about this issue, 'crossing the river by feeling the stones,' let's do it first, so there is 'socialism with Chinese characteristics.'
In this case, in 2001, the CPC Central Committee published a brief history of the Chinese Communist Party to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the founding of the Chinese Communist Party and the new edition of the History of the Communist Party of China (Vol. 1) published the following year. Chen Duxiu鈥檚 'Second Revolution Theory of Opportunism'.
On December 1, 1935, Kirov, who was prestigious in the Soviet Union and was taller than Stalin, was assassinated at the Leningrads Morni Palace.
The case was quickly annihilated by the murderer and the murderer, and it is still a mystery.
However, Stalin quickly seized the opportunity and conducted a large trial and major cleansing of different opinions of different opinions in the past.
From Zinoviev, Kamenev, Bukharin to Trotsky in exile, in the country, after the forced letter, all shots; originally deported and transferred to Mexico Trotsky, the KGB who was also sent by Stalin, cruelly hacked with an axe.
At the same time, in order to cooperate with the crazy movement of the Communist Party of China, Wang Ming and Kang Sheng (returned to China in November 1937), the deputy representatives of the Communist Party of China in the Communist Party of China, were successively in the organs of the Communist Party - Paris. The 'Salvation Times', Yan'an 'Emancipation' and Wuhan's 'People' and 'Xinhua Daily' fell on Chen Duxiu, a traitor who received a subsidy of 300 yuan from the Japanese detective agency every month.
This said that it caused public opinion and asked the CCP to produce evidence.
Chen Duxiu also issued a statement to be refuted and prepared to go to court.
After Zhou Enlai did a lot of work, and Xu Teli came forward to mediate, and the anti-Japanese war was tight, Wuhan quickly fell, although the matter has not gone to court, but it has not been.
So, Chen Duxiu鈥檚 hat on the head of the 'traitor' has not been removed until he died.
When he published Mao Zedong鈥檚 personally-approved Selected Works of Mao Zedong in 1951, there was a note that completely repeated the fall of Wang Ming and Kang Sheng in the 1930s: after the defeat of the Chinese revolution in 1927, China also appeared. A small number of Trotsky elements, combined with Chen Duxiu and other traitors, formed a counter-revolutionary small organization in 1929... After the September 18th Incident, they accepted the Trotsky thief鈥檚 'do not hinder Japan.' The empire鈥檚 occupation of China, in cooperation with the Japanese secret service, received a Japanese allowance and engaged in various activities that benefit the Japanese aggressors.
When Wang Ming and Kang Sheng's fall in the 1930s were 'traitors' and 'traitors', people thought that Mao Zedong disagreed with this. Now it seems that they did not agree at the time, but then they changed.
Because, before Wang Ming and Kang Sheng returned to Moscow from November 1937, on April 25, 1936, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China headed by Mao Zedong issued the 'Declaration of the Anti-Japanese People's Front for the creation of various parties and factions across the country', which was called for Among the 40 parties and groups on the list, there is the 'China Trotskyist League.'
In August 1937, when Chen Duxiu was released from prison, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China published 'Timely Review' and expressed his welcome and expectation to Chen Duxiu: 'When Mr. Chen Duxiu resumed his freedom, everyone is thankful for Mr. Chen. I hope... (he) to reinvigorate the spirit of the veterans and then join the revolutionary ranks.
' But after solving the problem of Wang Ming鈥檚 attempt to seize power at the Sixth Plenary Session of the Sixth Plenary Session in September 1938, Mao Zedong did not dare to offend Stalin and inherited the dress of Chen Duxiu as a 'traitor' in Wang Ming's depression.
The first Yan Fu Academic Lecture, hosted by Peking University's Department of Philosophy and Peking University Taoist Research Center, was held at Peking University on December 18.
The first Yan Fu academic lecture was given by Professor Tong Yijie, a professor at Peking University and dean of the Confucian Institute of Peking University. He gave a speech entitled 'The Hard Course of Enlightenment in China'.
The lecture was hosted by Chen Quying, a professor of humanities at Peking University and director of the Peking University Taoist Research Center. More than 500 students from North Masters and friends from all walks of life listened to the lecture.
'Deng Xiaoping Theory' is a complete reversal of 'Chen Duxiu's second revolutionary theory of opportunism'. The original title: The difficult process of China's housing reform The continuous introduction of foreign animation, Chinese animation knows its own shortcomings, so it began various explorations. And try.
The large-scale animation 'Lotus Lotus' made in China in 1999 absorbed foreign production methods and experiences, combined with traditional Chinese myths and legends.
The large-scale animated 'Journey to the West' can also be considered as one of the attempts.
In 2004, the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television issued the 'Several Opinions on the Development of China's Film and Television Animation Industry'. In 2006, the General Office of the State Council forwarded the Ministry of Finance and other departments on 'Promoting the Development of China's Animation Industry'. Today, many animation industry bases and animation education research Bases and private animation companies broke out. The animation festivals and animation exhibitions abound everywhere. Local governments are even more eager to support the development of the slow-moving industry in the region, with a view to creating new economic growth points.
Since Cai Hesen published 'The Nature and Future of the Chinese Revolution' in November 1928, the leaders of the Chinese Communist Party and almost all mainland scholars regard Chen Duxiu as 'the second revolutionary of opportunism'. The cause is Chen Duxiu in 1923. Two articles published: 'The Revolution of the Bourgeois and the Revolutionary Bourgeoisie', 'The Chinese National Revolution and the Social Classes.'
Because, Chen Duxiu clearly stated in the article: 'After the success of the National Revolution, under the ordinary situation, it is natural that the bourgeoisie holds the political power.
'Cai, in order to adapt to the needs of Stalin and the CCP to demonize Chen Duxiu, took this view for granted that Chen Duxiu advocated a phase of capitalist development between the democratic revolution and the socialist revolution.
Since then, mainland scholars no longer seriously read the original intention of Chen Duxiu's article, but because of the rumors of Cai and Sen's point of view, deliberately not mentioning Chen Duxiu's article followed by another sentence: If there are special circumstances, 'the working class is in the other The acquisition of a number of political powers depends on the extent of the working class鈥檚 efforts in the revolution and the situation in the world, such as the October Revolution after the February Revolution in Russia.
After the reform and opening up, first of all, Mr. Jia Lichen of Daqing Teachers College, in his editorial of 'Modern History of China', denied the view that Chen Duxiu鈥檚 two articles in 1923 were the so-called 'opportunistic second revolution' theory. Chen 'has made a scientific foresight on the two futures of the Chinese revolution. It is a great improvement compared to the view that there is only one future.' Chen Duxiu鈥檚 analysis of the various classes of Chinese society and the foresight of the revolutionary future, He played a positive role in promoting the early realization of cooperation between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, and made certain contributions to the Chinese Communist Party's proposal on the basic ideas of the new-democratic revolution.'
Afterwards, Japanese scholar Jiang Tianxian ruled more clearly that Chen Duxiu was a 'two-stage continuous revolutionary theory.'
Because Chen Duxiu believes that no matter who is led by the democratic revolution (even bourgeois leadership), who will control the political power after victory (even if the bourgeoisie holds power), then the proletariat is likely to carry out a socialist revolution.
He is supported by Chen Wenzhong鈥檚 transition from the bourgeois revolution of February 1917 to the socialist revolution of October in Russia, emphasizing that no one has ever said that Lenin, who led this transition, is the 'second revolutionary of opportunism'. .
At the end of the 'Cultural Revolution', China has ushered in a new era of reform and opening up.
When the commemoration of the 60th anniversary of the May Fourth Movement in 1979 and the 60th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party in 1981, domestic scholars held a grand academic seminar and published a number of important articles. Among them, in response to the above, it was also suggested that Chen Duxiu should be affirmed. The status and role of the May Fourth and the founding of the Party.
For example, General Xiaok, who is famous for Confucianism, said at the Symposium on the 60th Anniversary of the Founding of the Communist Party of China: 'The problem of Chen Duxiu is a restricted area in the past. It is now a semi-restricted area. It is said to be a semi-restricted area. Many people have contacted in several aspects.' /p>
But it's not comprehensive, it's not deep, and there are probably concerns.
' 'Don't seriously study Chen Duxiu, and writing party history in the future will be one-sided.'
Not long ago, when I watched the documentary 'The Song of the Pioneers', I could not see the commander-in-chief of the May Fourth Movement and the most important figure of the founding party.
In the lens of the founding party, Li Dazhao appeared.
However, 'Southern Chen Bei Li' is a conclusion in line with historical facts.
Li Dazhao is right as one of the main figures in the founding of the party, but Chen Duxiu should be the first.
鈥?The financial system is a mirror of the real economy, and the banking industry tends to observe the lagging indicators of the economic cycle.
Even so, we can observe China's financial stability, especially in the banking and securities industries.
After the securities industry experienced significant fluctuations, both Hong Kong stocks and A-shares have improved in the past three quarters.
The quiet changes in the banking industry may be overlooked.
From 2012 to 2015, China's banking industry's profit growth rate quickly dropped from 36% to %, and people worried about the bank's profitability, asset quality and risk status.
As far as 2016 is concerned, China's banking industry's profit growth rate, ROA and ROE are % and %, respectively, and the profit indicators have improved slightly, while the asset non-performing rate and problem loans seem to have reached the turning point of improvement, while capital Adequacy and provision levels remained stable.
If these momentums are maintained, the worst situation in the Chinese banking industry seems to be in the past.
From the perspective of the debt market, the debt situation of local governments has changed a lot, but corporate bonds have been repeated, and it seems that financial stability is gradually becoming clear.
And the stock market, the commodity and real estate market is still heating up.
Financial stabilization and asset warming are likely to provide a different path to the de-leverage and de-capacity of the Chinese economy, both asset-side and demand-side.
In such a political and academic atmosphere, some scholars who studied the May Fourth Movement and the early dissemination of Marxism in China, because they could not avoid the historical role of Chen Duxiu in specific discussions, have been criticized, such as Sun Sibai, Ding Shouhe, Peng Ming, Lin Maosheng and so on.
In the 'Cultural Revolution', it was even more affected by 'touching the flesh'.
Their 'crime' is 'to turn the case for the traitor Chen Duxiu!' On July 17, 1981, the People鈥檚 Daily published a speech on the front page of Mao Zedong鈥檚 speech at the Seventh Preparatory Meeting of the Chinese Communist Party on April 21, 1945. When talking about Chen Duxiu, Mao Zedong said with deep affection: He has done a good job. He was the commander-in-chief of the May Fourth Movement, and the whole movement was actually led by him. At that time, there was the magazine 'New Youth', edited by Chen Duxiu. Some people who were awakened by this magazine and the May Fourth Movement, some of them entered the Communist Party. These people were greatly influenced by Chen Duxiu and a group of people around him. It can be said that they were brought together and this established the party. He created the party and made a contribution. Subsequently, after long-term extensive argumentation and publicity by many scholars, Chen Duxiu was the chief commander of the May Fourth Movement and the main founder of the Chinese Communist Party. It was gradually recognized by people from all walks of life and accepted by the government. Although the theme is to prevent Chen Duxiu from improper propaganda and 'no refusal to turn over the case', but also have to admit: 'Chen Duxiu has undeniable achievements during the founding of the Party.' The CPC Party History Book, written by the Central Party History Research Office, is 1991. The 'History of the Communist Party of China' published in 2002 and 2002, as well as the film 'Opening the Earth' and the TV series 'Sunrise Oriental' won the Central Propaganda Department and the Ministry of Culture, all enthusiastically praised Chen Duxiu's historical achievements during the May Fourth Movement and the founding of the Party. . It can be seen that at this time, the traditional concept of 'May 4th Nothing' and 'One Big' and 'Bad Choice Theory' that ruled the Chinese public opinion for decades has been completely negated. In 1979 and 1980, the academic circles daringly questioned the 'traitorous' theory while first authenticating Chen Duxiu's May Fourth and Party building issues. The author also published a 'new test of the old case - about Wang Ming, Kang Sheng's fall of Chen Duxiu as a traitor issue', to demonstrate. This matter immediately attracted attention. In the 1984 Document No. 13 of the Central Propaganda Department, 'Notice on Seriously Preventing the Unfair Propaganda of Chen Duxiu' (Zhong Xuan Wen Wen No. 13), finally clearly acknowledged: 'Wang Ming and Kang Sheng in the 1930s were traitors. It is also not true.' In fact, Chen Duxiu鈥檚 'traitor' crime was rehabilitated. Document No. 13 publicly redressed Chen Duxiu鈥檚 sin crimes about Chen Duxiu during the May Fourth Movement and the founding of the Communist Party. In the early days of the founding of New China, the Propaganda Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China gave a report to the Central Committee on December 2, 1954, stating: 'Recently, about Chen Duxiu in the May Fourth The question of the valuation of the role before and after the movement, because this issue involves the historical discussion of the May Fourth Movement and the editing of the materials, has been repeatedly raised. The 'Modern Chinese History Series' published by the People's Publishing House has a 'May 4th Movement'. Because it is not certain that Chen Duxiu鈥檚 article can be selected, he has to temporarily put down the compiled manuscript; the editorial department of 鈥淐hina Youth鈥?once doubted whether the historical papers of the May Fourth Movement can mention Chen Duxiu鈥檚 name; Marxism College edited the history of the Chinese revolutionary newspaper. I also encountered this problem. Recently, the Propaganda Department of Sichuan Wulong County Committee also sent a letter to ask: The Soviet Union鈥檚 articles and photos of the revolutionary traitor Beria were burned out. Why did the book 鈥淪elected Chinese Modern History Materials鈥?published by Sanlian Bookstore also have The article of the revolutionary traitor Chen Duxiu鈥檚 'The Defense of the New Youth Crime'?' Report proposal: The narrative of relevant historical facts may not need to avoid mentioning him. Relevant historical materials may select some of his influential papers, but there should be appropriate criticism or remarks to explain his role at the time. Later act of rebellion against the revolution. This proposal was actually influenced by Hu Qiaomu's 'Thirty Years of the Communist Party of China.' This book, as well as the 'Chinese Revolutionary History Lecture' (Hu Hua), which was widely used as a textbook in colleges and universities in the 1950s and 1960s, was written in the May Fourth New Culture Movement, and generally did not mention Chen Duxiu, but only Li Dazhao, and some In the same way as Mao Zedong's approach, plus a 'new cultural movement's main player Lu Xun'; to preach the pre-party Marxist propaganda, only Li Dazhao and Mao Zedong, not Chen Duxiu. The 'Handout' even said that Mao Zedong 'made an ideological preparation for the establishment of a proletarian party in China' in 1920. (Mao Zedong himself said to Snow in 1936: He listened to Chen Duxiu鈥檚 conversation in 1920 and read Chen Duxiu. After the three books of Marxism, such as the Communist Manifesto, were recommended, they were transformed into a Marxist-leader. When writing that the CCP had to mention that Chen Duxiu was elected as the secretary of the Central Bureau, they also stressed that 'Chen Duxiu is not a good Marxist' and said that 'he appeared in the face of Marxism, but in essence it was a small asset. The class revolutionary'; Chen Duxiu was elected as the leader of the party Central Committee because of 'the childishness of the party at the time of the founding' and the 'wrong choice' of the whole party. Once published, the book has received wide acclaim among readers. There are quite a few places that use this book as a recommended book for the education of socialism with Chinese characteristics and the education of the Chinese nation for national rejuvenation, which is fully affirmed by readers. Many readers have reflected that this book profoundly tells the historical context of China's history from strong to declining, from struggle to new prosperity, reflecting the Chinese people's spirit of unity and perseverance, and adding a history of national rejuvenation of the Chinese dream. Responsibility. Many schools have used this book as a student's extracurricular reading list and received good results. Many young readers say that this book is easy to understand, illustrated, knowledgeable, and good at telling the truth in a story. It is a good book that vividly tells the Chinese dream. Tang Baolin On the original intention of the book, Wang Shuzeng said that the Liberation War is a peculiar war in the history of world war. What is peculiar is that in just a few years, the two sides of the war, with a disproportionate amount of such combat strength, took an amazing historical turnaround in just two or three years. As a war, the liberation war is not completely explained by the military viewpoint. It must contain all the factors such as the land, the country's politics, economy, culture, and national psychology. In addition, the war of liberation is directly related to the style of life in China today, and is closely related to the destiny of each of us. I think it is necessary for me to write it seriously, use my pen to describe some of the past and provide it to readers who like me. I wrote for our fathers, because the war of liberation is not far from us. Many participants in the war are still alive. I have seen many of them, my fathers who are very respectful. What they have given me is I am deeply touched by the transmission of the concept of life, such as happiness and happiness. I believe that I can touch my things and infect and impress our readers through my own pen. On August 7, 1927, the resolution of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (August 7th Meeting), the resolution of the Central Political Bureau of the Central Political Bureau in November 1929, and the resolution on certain historical issues of the Party adopted by the Seventh Plenary Session of the Sixth Central Committee in 1945 Three important resolutions that have a decisive influence on Chen Duxiu's fate. These resolutions, as well as other documents based on these resolutions, leaders鈥?speeches, articles, and Mao Zedong鈥檚 Secretary Hu Qiaomu鈥檚 'Thirty Years of the Communist Party of China' written in 1951, gave Chen Duxiu ten hats - we call it a must-have 'Ten sins': the second revolutionary theory of opportunism, the right opportunism, the right-wing capitulation line, the abandonment of the Chen, the anti-Soviet, the anti-communist, the anti-Party, the counter-revolution, the traitor, the traitor.
Copyright Notice：Original article of this site, in2018/07/20 play slot free scr 888，由 You Know Publish。More